Updated in February 2026
The federal Pell Grant program is the "foundational" federal student aid program. The program provides grants to undergraduate students with financial need who have not yet earned their first bachelor's degree, to help pay the costs of attending a postsecondary institution. During the annual congressional appropriations process, the minimum and maximum Pell Grant award levels are established for the upcoming award year. During award years 2024-25 and 2025-26, Pell Grants ranged from $740 to $7,395.1 The Pell Grant amount students receive is based on their institution's cost of attendance and family's financial need, and schools must determine a student's Pell Grant eligibility before calculating eligibility for other federal student aid programs.
In the 2022-23 award year, approximately 6 million students received a Pell Grant. During the same year, the average grant amount received was $4,511, and total federal expenditures for the program totaled $27.2 billion.2 The vast majority of Pell Grant recipients come from low-income backgrounds, with just over 75% of recipients during the 2022-23 award year having a family income of less than $40,000 (see Table 1).
Family Income Level |
Number |
Percentage |
|
$6,000 or less |
1,159,442 |
19% |
|
$6,001 to $15,000 |
865,575 |
14% |
|
$15,001 to $20,000 |
579,849 |
10% |
|
$20,001 to $30,000 |
1,081,801 |
18% |
|
$30,000 to $40,000 |
795,710 |
13% |
|
$40,001 to $50,000 |
601,014 |
10% |
|
$50,001 to $60,000 |
425,137 |
7% |
|
$60,001 and over |
524,446 |
9% |
|
Total |
6,032,974 |
100% |
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Federal Pell Grant Program End-of-year Report, 2022-23.
The Pell Grant program is especially critical to supporting postsecondary access for other historically underrepresented student populations beyond low-income students (see Table 2). Students of color are more likely to be Pell Grant recipients, with nearly 60% of Black students and roughly half of American Indian/Alaska Native and Hispanic students receiving a grant each year, compared with just under one-third of white students. Additionally, roughly half of first-generation college students and student parents, and almost 40% of student veterans, are Pell Grant recipients.3
Student Demographic |
Percent Receiving Pell |
|
Black or African American |
60% |
|
Hispanic / Latino |
50% |
|
American Indian / Alaska Native |
45% |
|
White |
32% |
|
Native Hawaiian / other Pacific Islander |
39% |
|
Asian |
34% |
|
More than one race |
39% |
|
First Generation |
48% |
|
Student Parents |
54% |
|
Student Veterans |
36% |
Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2019-20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20), First Look at Student Financial Aid Estimates for 2019-20.
The issue of college affordability in the context of student loan debt has received ever-increasing attention from the media and Congress, yet today's maximum Pell Grant award remains at a level similar to fiscal year (FY) 1978, when adjusting for inflation.4 From FY 2014 to FY 2017, the Pell Grant maximum award was indexed to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U); however, that small boost, which averaged only $69 per year, expired at the end of FY 2017. Since then, Congress has passed small increases to the maximum award as part of the annual appropriations process that have barely kept pace with inflation (see Figure 1).

Source: Department of Education, Federal Pell Grant Program End-of-year Report, 2022-23; FSA data from website, 2025. Inflation-adjusted to 2024 dollars, calculated by NASFAA, using CPI-U for the July beginning of the academic year.
Further, the maximum Pell Grant amount has not kept pace with increases in college costs (see Table 3). The 2025-26 maximum Pell Grant of $7,3955 covers only 27% of the average cost of attendance at a public four-year institution,6 while the maximum grant in 1975-76 covered more than three-quarters of the cost of attending a public four-year institution.7 Although the small increases passed by Congress each year have been helpful in providing an upward momentum for the program, Congress should, at a minimum, provide a $200 increase to the maximum Pell Grant for FY 2027, while working towards a maximum award of $13,000. This proposal is long overdue and has been supported by many in the higher education community. This front-end investment in college affordability will take an important first step toward restoring the Pell Grant to its original purchasing power and ensuring more equitable access to postsecondary education for all Americans.
Sector (living arrangement) |
Total Average Cost of Attendance (COA) |
Percent of COA Covered by 2025-26 Maximum Pell Grant |
Percent of COA Covered by Maximum Pell Grant if Increased to $13,000 |
|
Public 2-year (in-state, living off campus not with family) |
$24,548 |
30.1% |
53.0% |
|
Public 2-year (in-state, living off campus with family) |
$17,993 |
41.1% |
72.3% |
|
Public 4-year (in-state, living on campus) |
$27,182 |
27.2% |
47.8% |
|
Private 4-year (living on campus) |
$51,270 |
14.4% |
25.4% |
Sources:
Increasing the maximum Pell Grant to $13,000, which would double the maximum grant amount from the 2021-2022 award year of $6,495, would increase the grant amounts received by current recipients. This increase in the maximum award would also extend eligibility to some additional, moderate-income students who do not currently qualify for the grant.
Along with increasing the maximum Pell Grant to $13,000, NASFAA recommends lawmakers consider enacting a minimum Pell Grant award of 5% of the maximum award (rather than the current 10%). This would allow more students to receive a grant, maintaining the minimum award closer to its current level and removing the possibility of a steep eligibility cliff for students whose SAIs fall just outside of the Pell-eligible range.
While costly, providing robust increases to the Pell Grant simply makes up for necessary investments in federal student aid that have been pushed off for decades. Increasing the Pell Grant is targeted to students with the greatest need, and represents a sustainable, front-end, and long-term solution to college access and affordability issues impacting lower-income students.
The Pell Grant program's discretionary funding, which funds the majority of each year's maximum award, has been relatively flat and has not seen an increase in a number of years. Appropriators are unlikely to have room in their budget allocation each year to cover the cost of this increased Pell approach through discretionary increases alone. Consequently, program investments of this nature will likely require mandatory investments. NASFAA has long supported transitioning the Pell Grant program to fully mandatory funding to align its structure with how it operates — as an entitlement.
Publication Date: 2/13/2026