By Hugh T. Ferguson, NASFAA Managing Editor
A hearing to consider the Biden administration’s proposed borrower defense settlement that would discharge the loans of 200,000 borrowers who say they were defrauded by their institutions — originally scheduled for next week — has been delayed so the court can consider a pair of motions that seek to contest the agreement.
Since the Department of Education’s (ED) announcement of the proposed settlement and their ramped up efforts to process discharges, proprietary schools have urged the court to carefully consider the agreement and have filed motions to intervene in the case.
According to legal documents, the judge overseeing the court case — dubbed Sweet v. Cardona — will hear those arguments on August 4 and could also consider whether to grant preliminary approval of the settlement.
Correction 7/22/22: This article was updated to clarify that the borrowers whose loans may be discharged have claimed they were defrauded by their institutions. While this lawsuit concerns the adjudication and processing of pending borrower defense claims, it does not make a finding on the merit of those claims.
Publication Date: 7/21/2022
Federal Appeals Court Reverses SAVE Dismissal, Advancing ED and Missouri’s Settlement
ED Receives Recommendations to Reform Institute of Education Sciences
ED Announces Upcoming FAFSA System Updates Related to OBBBA
FSA’s Federal Update Details New Webinar Series and Works Through OBBBA Provisions
ED Publishes NPRM to Implement Pell Provisions Enacted Under OBBBA
Staffing Changes at the U.S. Department of Education in 2025
Federal Court Denies Missouri’s Request to Pause Dismissal of SAVE Lawsuit
White Paper: Additional Actions Need to Be Taken to Reform Graduate Education Financing
Court Dismisses ED’s SAVE Settlement, Leaving More Questions for Borrowers
NASFAA Comments on Regulations for Student Loan Provisions of OBBBA
Federal Student Aid Changes Implemented Through Reconciliation
Off the Cuff - Episode 353 Transcript
ED Announces New Agency Partnerships with State Department on Foreign Gift Reporting
ED Releases Updated Data on Nonpayment Rates by Institution, Warns of High Cohort Default Rates
New Analysis Looks at How OBBBA Will Impact Government Costs of Federal Student Loans
2027-28 FAFSA Now Open For Public Comment
ED Issues New Proposed Interpretive Rule Warning Against Use of 'Regional Accreditation' Terminology
NASFAA Participates in Panel on New Professional Degree Definition
Off the Cuff - Episode 350 Transcript
GAO: ED’s RIF Effort for Office of Civil Rights Cost Over $28 Million
ED’s Funding for FY 2026 Enacted After House Passage of Revised Spending Deal
ED Releases Guidance on Lapse in Appropriations As Congress Continues Work on Funding Package
House Continues Work on Appropriations Package, Trying to Avert Shutdown’s Impact
ED Publishes NPRM to Implement Student Loan Changes Enacted Under OBBBA
NASFAA, Higher Ed Organizations Provide Comments to ED on Accreditation Process
ED Seeks Nominations for New Neg Reg Committee Focused on Accreditation
House Passes FY 2026 Spending Package, Awaits Senate Action
NASFAA, Higher Ed Organizations Provide Comments to ED on Accreditation Process
Off the Cuff - Episode 348 Transcript
New ED Status Report Shows Gradual Processing of IDR, PSLF Backlog
Trump Administration Begins to Send ED Employees to DOL
Involuntary Collections on Defaulted Student Loans Delayed While ED Rolls Out OBBBA
ED: FSA Conference Registration Open Through January 23
Legislative Tracker: Quality & Accountability
AHEAD Committee Reaches Consensus On Entire Accountability Package
AHEAD Committee Continues Discussion on Teach-Out Proposal
Off the Cuff - Episode 347 Transcript
AHEAD Committee Kicks Off Second Neg Reg Session Focused on New Accountability Framework
2025 Year in Review: NASFAA’s Policy, Grant, and Advocacy Efforts
Estimated Impact of the Program Level Earnings Test and Changes to Gainful Employment
Advertisement

Jeff A | 7/21/2022 8:28:17 AM
Additionally, there are non profit schools that have petitioned the court. It is not just proprietary colleges.
Jeff A | 7/21/2022 8:26:10 AM
Most likely many of these borrowers weee not defrauded. And many more are simply closed school discharges, not fraud. And still more were already adjudicated to be without merit. It is inaccurate to represent that they were all defrauded. This is a political action that has already disrupted the integrity of the BDR process, unfortunately.
You must be logged in to comment on this page.